Comparação: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

Médio-alto

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

G-FORCE WINTER 2

WinterCraft WP52+

Winter

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

Número de testes

23

3

2

18

Best position

#1

#4

#1

Average position

6.7

4.3

1.5

5.1

Teste mais recente

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

107

97

65

93

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

Frenagem úmida

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

59%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

59%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

75%

Curva em círculo molhado

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

55%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

55%

Aquaplanagem longitudinal

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

81%

Aquaplanagem transversal

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

73%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

91%

Desempenho em piso seco

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

77%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

Travagem a seco

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

81%

Manuseamento a seco

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

64%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

73%

Desempenho na neve

96%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

83%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

87%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

Travagem de neve

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

78%

Tracção na neve

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

87%

Manipulação da neve

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

96%

Dunlop Winter

79%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

96%

Curvas em círculo na neve

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

88%

Conforto e ruído

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

74%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

Ruído externo

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

69%

Conforto ao rodar

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

78%

Economia

67%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Hankook

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

Resistência ao rolamento

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

73%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

65%

Quilometragem

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

87%

Testes usados na comparação

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Inverno	2025	225/40 R18	Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Comparação: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330

G-FORCE WINTER 2

WinterCraft WP52+

Winter

Winter i*cept evo3 W330

Test profile

Comparação de desempenho

Testes usados na comparação

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação