4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Dunlop Winter

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Dunlop
Winter
Número de testes
23
25
29
2
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.7
12.4
3.7
1.5
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
107
54
178
65

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
69%
Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Frenagem úmida
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
51%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
67%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Curva em círculo molhado
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
55%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
46%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Aquaplanagem transversal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Desempenho em piso seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
69%
Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Travagem a seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Manuseamento a seco
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Desempenho na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
81%
Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Travagem de neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Tracção na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Manipulação da neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Dunlop Winter
79%
Curvas em círculo na neve
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Conforto e ruído
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
65%
Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Ruído externo
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Conforto ao rodar
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Economia
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
71%
Fulda
Kristall Control HP2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Resistência ao rolamento
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Quilometragem
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
60%
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
69%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2025225/40 R18Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação