4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian WetProof vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nokian
WetProof
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
14
14
4
28
Melhor posição
#8
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
13.4
5.6
3.3
2.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2023
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
47
40
68

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nokian WetProof
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Nokian WetProof
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Nokian WetProof
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Frenagem úmida
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Nokian WetProof
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nokian WetProof
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Curva em círculo molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Nokian WetProof
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Desempenho em piso molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Nokian WetProof
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Guia lateral húmida
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Nokian WetProof
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Nokian WetProof
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Travagem a seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Nokian WetProof
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Manuseamento a seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Nokian WetProof
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Desempenho em piso seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
Nokian WetProof
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Mudança de faixa seca
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Nokian WetProof
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Resposta da direcção seca
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Nokian WetProof
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Comportamento em condução seca
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Nokian WetProof
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Conforto
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Nokian WetProof
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Ruído exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nokian WetProof
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Conforto
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Nokian WetProof
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Ruído interior
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Nokian WetProof
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Custos
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nokian WetProof
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Resistência ao rolamento
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Nokian WetProof
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Quilometragem
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Nokian WetProof
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Preço/valor
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Nokian WetProof
46%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store