4 lojas · 0+ produtos

Comparação: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
14
21
1
4
3
Melhor posição
#8
#2
#1
#2
#2
Posição média
13.4
11.9
1.0
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
165
66
40
36

Estes pneus não foram testados em conjunto no mesmo teste. as pontuações abaixo são agregadas a partir de diferentes testes independentes, pelo que a comparação direta deve ser interpretada com cautela.

Molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Frenagem úmida
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Comportamento em condução seca
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Conforto
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído interior
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Custos
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preço/valor
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

OBTER

PneuLab.eu

Grátis — na App Store

Compare pneus, leia resultados de testes e encontre os melhores preços — tudo numa única app.

Ver na App Store