4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test profile

Yokohama
W.drive V905
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Número de testes
10
23
13
14
Best position
#7
#1
#2
#1
Average position
14.0
6.7
6.2
3.6
Teste mais recente
2019
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
8
107
530
188

Molhado

Molhado
Yokohama W.drive V905
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Frenagem úmida
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Yokohama W.drive V905
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Curva em círculo molhado
Yokohama W.drive V905
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Yokohama W.drive V905
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Desempenho em molhado
Yokohama W.drive V905
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Neve

Neve
Yokohama W.drive V905
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Tracção na neve
Yokohama W.drive V905
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Travagem de neve
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Manipulação da neve
Yokohama W.drive V905
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Desempenho na neve
Yokohama W.drive V905
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Encanto da neve
Yokohama W.drive V905
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
Yokohama W.drive V905
27%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%

Seco

Seco
Yokohama W.drive V905
91%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Travagem a seco
Yokohama W.drive V905
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Manuseamento a seco
Yokohama W.drive V905
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Desempenho em piso seco
Yokohama W.drive V905
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Mudança de faixa seca
Yokohama W.drive V905
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Custos

Custos
Yokohama W.drive V905
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Quilometragem
Yokohama W.drive V905
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Resistência ao rolamento
Yokohama W.drive V905
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Preço/valor
Yokohama W.drive V905
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Conforto

Conforto
Yokohama W.drive V905
59%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Ruído exterior
Yokohama W.drive V905
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Ruído interior
Yokohama W.drive V905
53%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Conforto
Yokohama W.drive V905
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Gelo

Gelo
Yokohama W.drive V905
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Travagem brusca
Yokohama W.drive V905
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação