4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Yokohama BluEarth RV-02 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Yokohama
BluEarth RV-02
General
Tire Grabber GT Plus
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
2
2
6
1
Best position
#7
#9
#3
#1
Average position
7.0
9.0
4.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2020
2023
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
20
64
146
64

Molhado

Molhado
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
72%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Curva em círculo molhado
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
89%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
67%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
44%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
72%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Frenagem úmida
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
80%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Seco

Seco
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
83%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
88%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Conforto

Conforto
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
86%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
90%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Custos

Custos
Yokohama BluEarth RV-02
74%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação