4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Viking WinTech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Perfil do teste

Viking
WinTech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Número de testes
6
3
23
3
2
Melhor posição
#11
#2
#1
#2
#1
Posição média
20.8
3.3
3.3
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
59
40
176
34
23

Molhado

Molhado
Viking WinTech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Viking WinTech
46%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Viking WinTech
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Viking WinTech
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Frenagem úmida
Viking WinTech
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Curva em círculo molhado
Viking WinTech
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%

Neve

Neve
Viking WinTech
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Tracção na neve
Viking WinTech
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Travagem de neve
Viking WinTech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Manipulação da neve
Viking WinTech
47%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Encanto da neve
Viking WinTech
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%

Seco

Seco
Viking WinTech
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Travagem a seco
Viking WinTech
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Manuseamento a seco
Viking WinTech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Conforto

Conforto
Viking WinTech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Ruído exterior
Viking WinTech
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Ruído interior
Viking WinTech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Conforto
Viking WinTech
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Custos

Custos
Viking WinTech
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Quilometragem
Viking WinTech
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Gelo

Gelo
Viking WinTech
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação