Comparação: Viking WinTech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Económico

Viking

WinTech

VS

Comparar também com

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Perfil do teste

WinTech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Winter

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Número de testes

6

3

2

3

14

Melhor posição

#11

#2

#1

#2

#1

Posição média

20.8

3.3

1.5

3.7

3.6

Teste mais recente

2024

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

59

40

65

34

188

Molhado

Viking WinTech

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Frenagem úmida

Viking WinTech

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Curva em círculo molhado

Viking WinTech

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Viking WinTech

46%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Viking WinTech

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Viking WinTech

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Desempenho em molhado

Viking WinTech

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Seco

Viking WinTech

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Travagem a seco

Viking WinTech

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Manuseamento a seco

Viking WinTech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Desempenho em piso seco

Viking WinTech

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Dunlop Winter

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

Neve

Viking WinTech

62%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Tracção na neve

Viking WinTech

73%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Travagem de neve

Viking WinTech

71%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Manipulação da neve

Viking WinTech

47%

Dunlop Winter

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Encanto da neve

Viking WinTech

65%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Conforto

Viking WinTech

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Ruído exterior

Viking WinTech

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Ruído interior

Viking WinTech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Conforto

Viking WinTech

50%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Custos

Viking WinTech

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Quilometragem

Viking WinTech

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Gelo

Viking WinTech

84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Viking WinTech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

WinTech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Winter

e.Ziex

Blizzak 6

Perfil do teste

Molhado

Seco

Neve

Conforto

Custos

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação