4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Uniroyal WinterExpert vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Uniroyal
WinterExpert
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Número de testes
12
10
49
29
Best position
#5
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.3
12.2
3.2
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2024
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
93
207
213
178

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Uniroyal WinterExpert
56%
Uniroyal
WinterExpert
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
56%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
84%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Frenagem úmida
Uniroyal WinterExpert
55%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Uniroyal WinterExpert
51%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
84%
Curva em círculo molhado
Uniroyal WinterExpert
55%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
46%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Uniroyal WinterExpert
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Uniroyal WinterExpert
57%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
50%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Desempenho em piso seco
Uniroyal WinterExpert
51%
Uniroyal
WinterExpert
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
90%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
90%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Travagem a seco
Uniroyal WinterExpert
50%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Uniroyal WinterExpert
51%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Desempenho na neve
Uniroyal WinterExpert
83%
Uniroyal
WinterExpert
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
63%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Travagem de neve
Uniroyal WinterExpert
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
57%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
95%
Tracção na neve
Uniroyal WinterExpert
91%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Manipulação da neve
Uniroyal WinterExpert
92%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
84%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Uniroyal WinterExpert
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Conforto e ruído
Uniroyal WinterExpert
71%
Uniroyal
WinterExpert
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
58%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
67%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Ruído externo
Uniroyal WinterExpert
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Conforto ao rodar
Uniroyal WinterExpert
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
69%
Economia
Uniroyal WinterExpert
77%
Uniroyal
WinterExpert
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
77%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
65%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
69%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Resistência ao rolamento
Uniroyal WinterExpert
96%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
57%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Quilometragem
Uniroyal WinterExpert
57%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
57%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
50%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2022215/55 R17Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação