4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Uniroyal WinterExpert vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Test profile

Uniroyal
WinterExpert
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Número de testes
12
23
17
14
Best position
#5
#1
#1
#1
Average position
11.3
6.7
1.7
3.6
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
93
107
80
188

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Uniroyal WinterExpert
78%
Uniroyal
WinterExpert
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Frenagem úmida
Uniroyal WinterExpert
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Uniroyal WinterExpert
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Curva em círculo molhado
Uniroyal WinterExpert
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Uniroyal WinterExpert
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Uniroyal WinterExpert
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Desempenho em piso seco
Uniroyal WinterExpert
73%
Uniroyal
WinterExpert
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Travagem a seco
Uniroyal WinterExpert
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Manuseamento a seco
Uniroyal WinterExpert
67%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Desempenho na neve
Uniroyal WinterExpert
65%
Uniroyal
WinterExpert
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Travagem de neve
Uniroyal WinterExpert
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Tracção na neve
Uniroyal WinterExpert
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
88%
Manipulação da neve
Uniroyal WinterExpert
51%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
69%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Uniroyal WinterExpert
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Conforto e ruído
Uniroyal WinterExpert
66%
Uniroyal
WinterExpert
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
76%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
57%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Ruído externo
Uniroyal WinterExpert
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
57%
Economia
Uniroyal WinterExpert
82%
Uniroyal
WinterExpert
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
70%
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Resistência ao rolamento
Uniroyal WinterExpert
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
65%
Quilometragem
Uniroyal WinterExpert
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
Inverno
2024205/55 R16Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação