Comparação: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Médio-alto

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Médio-alto

Kleber

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Test profile

MS plus 77

KRISALP HP3

Blizzak LM-005

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance+

Número de testes

19

28

49

17

23

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

11.2

8.0

3.2

1.7

3.3

Teste mais recente

2021

2025

2024

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

76

115

213

80

176

Molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Frenagem úmida

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Curva em círculo molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Tracção na neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Travagem de neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Manipulação da neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Encanto da neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Desempenho na neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Custos

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Resistência ao rolamento

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Quilometragem

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Preço/valor

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Eficiência de combustível

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Conforto

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Ruído exterior

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Conforto

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Ruído interior

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

98%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Manuseamento a seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Travagem a seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Gelo

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Travagem brusca

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Orientação lateral do gelo

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

86%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

MS plus 77

KRISALP HP3

Blizzak LM-005

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Molhado

Neve

Custos

Conforto

Seco

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação