Comparação: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Hankook ION Evo

Médio-alto

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Prémio

GoodYear

Comparar também com

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Perfil do teste

MS plus 77

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Winter

ION Evo

Número de testes

19

3

5

2

1

Melhor posição

#3

#2

#1

Posição média

11.2

3.3

2.2

1.5

1.0

Teste mais recente

2021

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

76

40

63

65

64

Molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Frenagem úmida

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Curva em círculo molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Travagem de neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Manipulação da neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Dunlop Winter

79%

Tracção na neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Encanto da neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Custos

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Quilometragem

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Resistência ao rolamento

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Preço/valor

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Conforto

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Ruído exterior

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Conforto

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Travagem a seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Manuseamento a seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Gelo

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Hankook ION Evo

MS plus 77

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Winter

ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Molhado

Neve

Custos

Conforto

Seco

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação