4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Michelin ALPIN 7 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Michelin
ALPIN 7
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
19
14
6
17
Best position
#3
#3
#1
#1
Average position
11.2
16.0
3.7
1.7
Teste mais recente
2021
2020
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
76
66
62
80

Molhado

Molhado
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
67%
Michelin ALPIN 7
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
57%
Michelin ALPIN 7
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Frenagem úmida
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Michelin ALPIN 7
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Michelin ALPIN 7
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Curva em círculo molhado
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
60%
Michelin ALPIN 7
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Michelin ALPIN 7
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Neve

Neve
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Michelin ALPIN 7
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Manipulação da neve
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin ALPIN 7
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Michelin ALPIN 7
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Travagem de neve
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Michelin ALPIN 7
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Encanto da neve
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
87%
Michelin ALPIN 7
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Desempenho na neve
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Michelin ALPIN 7
91%

Custos

Custos
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
80%
Michelin ALPIN 7
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Quilometragem
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Michelin ALPIN 7
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Preço/valor
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Eficiência de combustível
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%

Conforto

Conforto
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Michelin ALPIN 7
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Michelin ALPIN 7
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Conforto
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Michelin ALPIN 7
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Ruído interior
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
68%
Michelin ALPIN 7
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Seco

Seco
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin ALPIN 7
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Michelin ALPIN 7
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Manuseamento a seco
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Michelin ALPIN 7
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Gelo

Gelo
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Travagem brusca
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação