4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Uniroyal MS plus 77Médio-alto
UniroyalUniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Prémio
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Médio-alto
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

8.1
R14 – R20
3 mutual test(s) with detailed data
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Número de testes
19
49
23
Best position
#3
#1
#1
Average position
11.2
3.2
6.7
Teste mais recente
2021
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
76
213
107

Comparação de desempenho

Média de 3 testes

Desempenho em molhado
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Frenagem úmida
Uniroyal MS plus 77
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
Curva em círculo molhado
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
85%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Desempenho em piso seco
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Travagem a seco
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Manuseamento a seco
Uniroyal MS plus 77
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
Desempenho na neve
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
88%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Travagem de neve
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Tracção na neve
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Manipulação da neve
Uniroyal MS plus 77
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Conforto e ruído
Uniroyal MS plus 77
76%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Ruído externo
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
88%
Conforto ao rodar
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Economia
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Resistência ao rolamento
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Quilometragem
Uniroyal MS plus 77
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2021205/55 R16Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2020245/45 R18Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2019225/45 R17Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação