Comparação: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Médio-alto

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Prémio

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-001

R14 – R21

Médio-alto

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7

R13 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

MS plus 77

Blizzak LM-001

WinterCraft WP52+

Número de testes

19

15

3

Best position

#3

#4

Average position

11.2

7.9

4.3

Teste mais recente

2021

2018

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

76

132

97

Molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Frenagem úmida

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Curva em círculo molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Desempenho em molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

82%

Neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Manipulação da neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Tracção na neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Travagem de neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Encanto da neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Custos

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Quilometragem

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Resistência ao rolamento

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Preço/valor

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Conforto

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Ruído exterior

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Conforto

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Travagem a seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Manuseamento a seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Gelo

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

MS plus 77

Blizzak LM-001

WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

Molhado

Neve

Custos

Conforto

Seco

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação