Comparação: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Médio-alto

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Médio-alto

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

MS plus 77

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Blizzak LM-005

WinterCraft WP52+

Número de testes

19

23

49

3

Best position

#3

#1

#4

Average position

11.2

6.7

3.2

4.3

Teste mais recente

2021

2025

2024

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

76

107

213

97

Molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Curva em círculo molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Frenagem úmida

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Travagem de neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Manipulação da neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Tracção na neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Encanto da neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Desempenho na neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

88%

Custos

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Quilometragem

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Resistência ao rolamento

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Preço/valor

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Eficiência de combustível

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Conforto

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Ruído exterior

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Conforto

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Ruído interior

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Travagem a seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Manuseamento a seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Gelo

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Travagem brusca

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Orientação lateral do gelo

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

MS plus 77

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Blizzak LM-005

WinterCraft WP52+

Test profile

Molhado

Neve

Custos

Conforto

Seco

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação