Comparação: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Médio-alto

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Budget

Barum

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

UltraGrip Performance 3

Winter

Test profile

MS plus 77

Polaris 5

Blizzak LM-005

G-FORCE WINTER 2

WinterContact TS 870

Número de testes

19

13

49

23

17

Best position

#3

#9

#1

Average position

11.2

15.2

3.2

6.7

1.7

Teste mais recente

2021

2024

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

76

213

107

80

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado

70%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

61%

Barum

Polaris 5

90%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

74%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

85%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Frenagem úmida

Uniroyal MS plus 77

55%

Barum Polaris 5

55%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

63%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

79%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Barum Polaris 5

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

81%

Curva em círculo molhado

Uniroyal MS plus 77

65%

Barum Polaris 5

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

81%

Aquaplanagem longitudinal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Barum Polaris 5

46%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Aquaplanagem transversal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

76%

Barum Polaris 5

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

97%

Desempenho em piso seco

75%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

63%

Barum

Polaris 5

76%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

59%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Travagem a seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Barum Polaris 5

55%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

63%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

63%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

71%

Manuseamento a seco

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Barum Polaris 5

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

55%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Desempenho na neve

57%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

75%

Barum

Polaris 5

93%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

85%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Travagem de neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Barum Polaris 5

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Tracção na neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

55%

Barum Polaris 5

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

79%

Manipulação da neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

42%

Barum Polaris 5

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

96%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Curvas em círculo na neve

Uniroyal MS plus 77

51%

Barum Polaris 5

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

100%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Conforto e ruído

66%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

65%

Barum

Polaris 5

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

75%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Ruído externo

Uniroyal MS plus 77

60%

Barum Polaris 5

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

78%

Conforto ao rodar

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Barum Polaris 5

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

71%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

71%

Economia

76%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

85%

Barum

Polaris 5

64%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

64%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

89%

Continental

WinterContact TS 870

Resistência ao rolamento

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Barum Polaris 5

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

73%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

56%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

82%

Quilometragem

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Barum Polaris 5

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

55%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

96%

Testes usados na comparação

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Inverno	2021	205/55 R16	Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Comparação: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

MS plus 77

Polaris 5

Blizzak LM-005

G-FORCE WINTER 2

WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Comparação de desempenho

Testes usados na comparação

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação