Comparação: Triangle EffeXWinter TW421 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Budget

Triangle

EffeXWinter TW421

VS

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

EffeXWinter TW421

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-005

Número de testes

1

3

49

Best position

#7

#4

#1

Average position

7.0

4.3

3.2

Teste mais recente

2025

2024

Tamanhos disponíveis

—

97

213

Molhado

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Curva em círculo molhado

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

62%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

25%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Frenagem úmida

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Seco

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Travagem a seco

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

95%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Comportamento em condução seca

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

20%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Mudança de faixa seca

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

57%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Desempenho em piso seco

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Neve

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

52%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Orientação lateral sobre a neve

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

44%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

Tracção na neve

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

55%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Travagem de neve

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

85%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Manipulação da neve

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

33%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Custos

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

44%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Resistência ao rolamento

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Quilometragem

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

18%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Conforto

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Ruído exterior

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Conforto

Triangle EffeXWinter TW421

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Triangle EffeXWinter TW421 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

EffeXWinter TW421

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Neve

Custos

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação