4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
2
3
11
3
Best position
#8
#2
#1
#2
Average position
17.5
3.3
11.6
3.7
Teste mais recente
2019
2026
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
74
40
121
34

Molhado

Molhado
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Conforto

Conforto
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Seco

Seco
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Custos

Custos
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Quilometragem
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação