4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
2
16
4
1
Best position
#8
#3
#3
#1
Average position
17.5
5.5
12.0
1.0
Teste mais recente
2019
2023
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
74
153
111
64

Molhado

Molhado
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Frenagem úmida
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Conforto

Conforto
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Seco

Seco
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Custos

Custos
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Quilometragem
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação