4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
2
16
1
3
Best position
#8
#3
#1
#2
Average position
17.5
5.5
1.0
3.7
Teste mais recente
2019
2023
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
74
153
64
34

Molhado

Molhado
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Conforto

Conforto
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Seco

Seco
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Custos

Custos
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Quilometragem
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação