4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
2
16
3
1
Best position
#8
#3
#2
#1
Average position
17.5
5.5
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2019
2023
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
74
153
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Curva em círculo molhado
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Frenagem úmida
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Conforto

Conforto
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Custos

Custos
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Quilometragem
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Seco

Seco
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação