4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Toyo Observe S944 vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

Toyo
Observe S944
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
Barum
Polaris 5
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Número de testes
11
28
13
23
49
Best position
#6
#2
#9
#1
#1
Average position
14.8
8.0
15.2
6.7
3.2
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2024
2025
2024
Tamanhos disponíveis
66
115
76
107
213

Seco

Seco
Toyo Observe S944
83%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Barum Polaris 5
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Travagem a seco
Toyo Observe S944
74%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
63%
Barum Polaris 5
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Manuseamento a seco
Toyo Observe S944
80%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Barum Polaris 5
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Comportamento em condução seca
Toyo Observe S944
73%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
76%
Barum Polaris 5
51%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Mudança de faixa seca
Toyo Observe S944
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Resposta da direcção seca
Toyo Observe S944
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Desempenho em piso seco
Toyo Observe S944
62%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%

Neve

Neve
Toyo Observe S944
65%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Tracção na neve
Toyo Observe S944
75%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
81%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Travagem de neve
Toyo Observe S944
73%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
86%
Barum Polaris 5
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Manipulação da neve
Toyo Observe S944
59%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Encanto da neve
Toyo Observe S944
60%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
85%
Barum Polaris 5
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
Toyo Observe S944
50%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Desempenho na neve
Toyo Observe S944
80%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

Molhado

Molhado
Toyo Observe S944
66%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
Barum Polaris 5
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Frenagem úmida
Toyo Observe S944
67%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
65%
Barum Polaris 5
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Toyo Observe S944
56%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
Barum Polaris 5
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Toyo Observe S944
70%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
69%
Barum Polaris 5
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Toyo Observe S944
71%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
Barum Polaris 5
65%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Curva em círculo molhado
Toyo Observe S944
60%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
72%
Barum Polaris 5
66%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%

Conforto

Conforto
Toyo Observe S944
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
78%
Barum Polaris 5
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Ruído exterior
Toyo Observe S944
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
79%
Barum Polaris 5
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Conforto
Toyo Observe S944
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
83%
Barum Polaris 5
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Ruído interior
Toyo Observe S944
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%

Custos

Custos
Toyo Observe S944
79%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
Barum Polaris 5
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Resistência ao rolamento
Toyo Observe S944
76%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
Barum Polaris 5
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Quilometragem
Toyo Observe S944
80%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
56%
Barum Polaris 5
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Eficiência de combustível
Toyo Observe S944
89%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%

Gelo

Gelo
Toyo Observe S944
87%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
78%
Barum Polaris 5
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Travagem brusca
Toyo Observe S944
87%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Barum Polaris 5
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Toyo Observe S944
86%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Barum Polaris 5
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Mutual tests available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Testes mútuos

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2023225/45 R18Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2023225/45 R18Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2022215/55 R17Ver
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2021205/55 R16Ver

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação