4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

Sava
Eskimo HP2
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Número de testes
15
19
23
14
17
49
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#1
#1
#1
Average position
15.5
11.2
3.3
3.6
1.7
3.2
Teste mais recente
2025
2021
2025
2025
2025
2024
Tamanhos disponíveis
28
76
176
188
80
213

Neve

Neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
78%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Tracção na neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Travagem de neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
86%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Manipulação da neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Encanto da neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Desempenho na neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

Seco

Seco
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Travagem a seco
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Comportamento em condução seca
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Desempenho em piso seco
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%

Molhado

Molhado
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Frenagem úmida
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Curva em círculo molhado
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%

Custos

Custos
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Quilometragem
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Preço/valor
Sava Eskimo HP2
92%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Eficiência de combustível
Sava Eskimo HP2
89%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Resistência ao rolamento
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Ruído exterior
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Conforto
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Ruído interior
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%

Gelo

Gelo
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Travagem brusca
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Sava Eskimo HP2
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação