4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Sava
Eskimo HP2
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Barum
Polaris 5
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
15
19
13
49
23
17
Best position
#6
#3
#9
#1
#1
#1
Average position
15.5
11.2
15.2
3.2
3.3
1.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2021
2024
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
28
76
76
213
176
80

Neve

Neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
78%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Tracção na neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Travagem de neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
86%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Barum Polaris 5
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Manipulação da neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Desempenho na neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
77%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Encanto da neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Barum Polaris 5
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Seco

Seco
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Barum Polaris 5
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Barum Polaris 5
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Comportamento em condução seca
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Barum Polaris 5
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Manuseamento a seco
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Barum Polaris 5
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Molhado

Molhado
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Barum Polaris 5
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Frenagem úmida
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Barum Polaris 5
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Barum Polaris 5
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Barum Polaris 5
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Barum Polaris 5
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Curva em círculo molhado
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Barum Polaris 5
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Custos

Custos
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Barum Polaris 5
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Quilometragem
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Barum Polaris 5
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Barum Polaris 5
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Preço/valor
Sava Eskimo HP2
92%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Barum Polaris 5
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Eficiência de combustível
Sava Eskimo HP2
89%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Conforto

Conforto
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Barum Polaris 5
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Barum Polaris 5
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Ruído interior
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Barum Polaris 5
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Conforto
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Barum Polaris 5
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Gelo

Gelo
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Barum Polaris 5
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Travagem brusca
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Barum Polaris 5
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Orientação lateral do gelo
Sava Eskimo HP2
87%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Barum Polaris 5
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
86%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação