4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Sava Eskimo HP2Budget
SavaSava

Eskimo HP2

5.8
R15 – R18
Uniroyal MS plus 77Médio-alto
UniroyalUniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19
Barum Polaris 5Budget
BarumBarum

Polaris 5

6.3
R13 – R19
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Prémio
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Médio-alto
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

8.1
R14 – R20
1 mutual test(s) with detailed data
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Sava
Eskimo HP2
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Barum
Polaris 5
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Número de testes
15
19
13
49
23
Best position
#6
#3
#9
#1
#1
Average position
15.5
11.2
15.2
3.2
6.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2021
2024
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
28
76
76
213
107

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado
Sava Eskimo HP2
54%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Uniroyal MS plus 77
70%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Barum Polaris 5
61%
Barum
Polaris 5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Frenagem úmida
Sava Eskimo HP2
46%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
55%
Barum Polaris 5
55%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
63%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Sava Eskimo HP2
57%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Barum Polaris 5
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Curva em círculo molhado
Sava Eskimo HP2
50%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
65%
Barum Polaris 5
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Aquaplanagem longitudinal
Sava Eskimo HP2
46%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Barum Polaris 5
46%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Aquaplanagem transversal
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
76%
Barum Polaris 5
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Desempenho em piso seco
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Barum Polaris 5
63%
Barum
Polaris 5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
59%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Travagem a seco
Sava Eskimo HP2
55%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Barum Polaris 5
55%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
63%
Manuseamento a seco
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Barum Polaris 5
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
55%
Desempenho na neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Uniroyal MS plus 77
57%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Barum Polaris 5
75%
Barum
Polaris 5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
85%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Travagem de neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
81%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Barum Polaris 5
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Tracção na neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
55%
Barum Polaris 5
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
Manipulação da neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
57%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
42%
Barum Polaris 5
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
96%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Curvas em círculo na neve
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
51%
Barum Polaris 5
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
Conforto e ruído
Sava Eskimo HP2
75%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Uniroyal MS plus 77
66%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Barum Polaris 5
65%
Barum
Polaris 5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Ruído externo
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
60%
Barum Polaris 5
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Conforto ao rodar
Sava Eskimo HP2
81%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Barum Polaris 5
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
Economia
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Uniroyal MS plus 77
76%
Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Barum Polaris 5
85%
Barum
Polaris 5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Resistência ao rolamento
Sava Eskimo HP2
73%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Barum Polaris 5
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
56%
Quilometragem
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Barum Polaris 5
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
55%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%

Testes usados na comparação

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Inverno
2021205/55 R16Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação