4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Riken Road Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
Kumho Ecsta HS52Médio-alto
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
BFGoodrich AdvantageMédio-alto
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Also compare with
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

Riken
Road Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Número de testes
—
10
14
Best position
—
#2
#8
Average position
—
6.0
13.4
Teste mais recente
—
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
—
104
153

Molhado

Molhado
Riken Road Performance
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Frenagem úmida
Riken Road Performance
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Riken Road Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%

Custos

Custos
Riken Road Performance
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Quilometragem
Riken Road Performance
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Conforto

Conforto
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Ruído exterior
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Seco

Seco
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Travagem a seco
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Testes mútuos

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
ADACADAC
Verão
2023205/55 R16Ver

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação