4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Riken Road Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Riken
Road Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Número de testes
3
4
2
Best position
#2
#3
#1
Average position
3.3
12.0
1.0
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
111
23

Molhado

Molhado
Riken Road Performance
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Frenagem úmida
Riken Road Performance
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Riken Road Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%

Seco

Seco
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Travagem a seco
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%

Custos

Custos
Riken Road Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Quilometragem
Riken Road Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Conforto

Conforto
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Ruído exterior
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação