4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Riken Road Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test profile

Riken
Road Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Número de testes
18
23
Best position
#1
#1
Average position
6.1
6.7
Teste mais recente
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
107

Molhado

Molhado
Riken Road Performance
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Riken Road Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Frenagem úmida
Riken Road Performance
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%

Seco

Seco
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Travagem a seco
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%

Custos

Custos
Riken Road Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Quilometragem
Riken Road Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Conforto

Conforto
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Ruído exterior
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação