4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Riken Road Performance vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Riken
Road Performance
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
2
4
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
Average position
1.0
12.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
23
111
40

Molhado

Molhado
Riken Road Performance
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Frenagem úmida
Riken Road Performance
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Riken Road Performance
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Custos

Custos
Riken Road Performance
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Quilometragem
Riken Road Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Conforto

Conforto
Riken Road Performance
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Riken Road Performance
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Seco

Seco
Riken Road Performance
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Riken Road Performance
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação