4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Riken Road Performance vs. Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

Riken
Road Performance
Apollo
Alnac 4G
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Número de testes
8
18
49
Best position
#2
#1
#1
Average position
18.9
6.1
3.2
Teste mais recente
2023
2024
2024
Tamanhos disponíveis
77
47
213

Molhado

Molhado
Riken Road Performance
70%
Apollo Alnac 4G
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Apollo Alnac 4G
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Frenagem úmida
Riken Road Performance
63%
Apollo Alnac 4G
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Riken Road Performance
76%
Apollo Alnac 4G
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%

Seco

Seco
Riken Road Performance
74%
Apollo Alnac 4G
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Travagem a seco
Riken Road Performance
74%
Apollo Alnac 4G
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%

Custos

Custos
Riken Road Performance
67%
Apollo Alnac 4G
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Quilometragem
Riken Road Performance
67%
Apollo Alnac 4G
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%

Conforto

Conforto
Riken Road Performance
74%
Apollo Alnac 4G
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Ruído exterior
Riken Road Performance
74%
Apollo Alnac 4G
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação