Comparação: Radar Dimax Alpine vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Económico

Radar

Dimax Alpine

VS

Comparar também com

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Perfil do teste

Dimax Alpine

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Número de testes

6

3

23

3

Melhor posição

#9

#4

#1

#2

Posição média

25.3

4.3

3.3

3.7

Teste mais recente

2024

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

59

97

176

34

Molhado

Radar Dimax Alpine

53%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Radar Dimax Alpine

53%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Radar Dimax Alpine

51%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Frenagem úmida

Radar Dimax Alpine

52%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Curva em círculo molhado

Radar Dimax Alpine

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Radar Dimax Alpine

50%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Neve

Radar Dimax Alpine

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Manipulação da neve

Radar Dimax Alpine

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Tracção na neve

Radar Dimax Alpine

57%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Travagem de neve

Radar Dimax Alpine

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Encanto da neve

Radar Dimax Alpine

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Seco

Radar Dimax Alpine

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Manuseamento a seco

Radar Dimax Alpine

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Travagem a seco

Radar Dimax Alpine

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Conforto

Radar Dimax Alpine

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ruído exterior

Radar Dimax Alpine

95%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Custos

Radar Dimax Alpine

38%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Resistência ao rolamento

Radar Dimax Alpine

38%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Radar Dimax Alpine vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Dimax Alpine

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Molhado

Neve

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação