Comparação: Prinx XLAB Comfort EV vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Prinx

XLAB Comfort EV

R13 – R

VS

Prémio

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

XLAB Comfort EV

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Número de testes

1

4

18

3

1

Best position

#7

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

7.0

12.0

6.1

3.7

3.3

1.0

Teste mais recente

2025

2024

2025

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

—

111

47

34

40

64

Molhado

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Frenagem úmida

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Curva em círculo molhado

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Conforto

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Ruído exterior

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

55%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Conforto

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

60%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Seco

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Travagem a seco

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Manuseamento a seco

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Custos

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Resistência ao rolamento

Prinx XLAB Comfort EV

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Prinx XLAB Comfort EV vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

XLAB Comfort EV

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Test profile

Molhado

Conforto

Seco

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação