Comparação: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Prémio

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Médio-alto

Kumho

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test profile

P ZERO

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Número de testes

17

10

3

1

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

6.1

6.0

3.3

3.7

1.0

Teste mais recente

2020

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

330

104

40

34

64

Molhado

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Frenagem úmida

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Curva em círculo molhado

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Seco

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Travagem a seco

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Manuseamento a seco

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Custos

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Resistência ao rolamento

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Quilometragem

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Conforto

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Ruído exterior

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

P ZERO

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Custos

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação