4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Nokian zLine vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test profile

Nokian
zLine
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Número de testes
8
18
14
Best position
#3
#1
#8
Average position
7.4
6.1
13.4
Teste mais recente
2018
2024
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
45
47
153

Molhado

Molhado
Nokian zLine
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian zLine
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian zLine
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian zLine
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian zLine
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian zLine
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%

Seco

Seco
Nokian zLine
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Travagem a seco
Nokian zLine
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian zLine
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Conforto

Conforto
Nokian zLine
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Ruído exterior
Nokian zLine
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Custos

Custos
Nokian zLine
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian zLine
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação