4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Nokian zLine vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Nokian
zLine
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
8
14
3
Best position
#3
#8
#2
Average position
7.4
13.4
3.3
Teste mais recente
2018
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
45
153
40

Molhado

Molhado
Nokian zLine
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian zLine
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian zLine
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian zLine
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian zLine
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian zLine
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Seco

Seco
Nokian zLine
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian zLine
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Travagem a seco
Nokian zLine
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Comportamento em condução seca
Nokian zLine
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Conforto

Conforto
Nokian zLine
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Nokian zLine
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Custos

Custos
Nokian zLine
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian zLine
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação