4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

Nokian
WR Snowproof P
Kleber
KRISALP HP3
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Número de testes
7
28
49
24
Best position
#4
#2
#1
#1
Average position
9.7
8.0
3.2
2.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
55
115
213
302

Neve

Neve
Nokian WR Snowproof P
77%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Travagem de neve
Nokian WR Snowproof P
83%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Tracção na neve
Nokian WR Snowproof P
78%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Encanto da neve
Nokian WR Snowproof P
64%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Manipulação da neve
Nokian WR Snowproof P
68%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
Nokian WR Snowproof P
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aceleração de neve
Nokian WR Snowproof P
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
94%

Molhado

Molhado
Nokian WR Snowproof P
64%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian WR Snowproof P
60%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian WR Snowproof P
72%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian WR Snowproof P
74%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian WR Snowproof P
75%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian WR Snowproof P
35%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%

Seco

Seco
Nokian WR Snowproof P
90%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Travagem a seco
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian WR Snowproof P
88%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Mudança de faixa seca
Nokian WR Snowproof P
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%

Custos

Custos
Nokian WR Snowproof P
85%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Preço/valor
Nokian WR Snowproof P
62%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Quilometragem
Nokian WR Snowproof P
81%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Conforto

Conforto
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Ruído exterior
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Conforto
Nokian WR Snowproof P
71%
Kleber KRISALP HP3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação