Comparação: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Médio-alto

Nokian

WR Snowproof P

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

WR Snowproof P

KRISALP HP3

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Blizzak LM-005

Número de testes

7

28

23

49

Best position

#4

#2

#1

Average position

9.7

8.0

6.7

3.2

Teste mais recente

2025

2024

Tamanhos disponíveis

55

115

107

213

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado

58%

Nokian

WR Snowproof P

71%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

71%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

89%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Frenagem úmida

Nokian WR Snowproof P

63%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

55%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Nokian WR Snowproof P

67%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

67%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

Curva em círculo molhado

Nokian WR Snowproof P

71%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

55%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

55%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

96%

Aquaplanagem longitudinal

Nokian WR Snowproof P

46%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

96%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Aquaplanagem transversal

Nokian WR Snowproof P

42%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

Desempenho em piso seco

83%

Nokian

WR Snowproof P

70%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

70%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Travagem a seco

Nokian WR Snowproof P

81%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

88%

Manuseamento a seco

Nokian WR Snowproof P

84%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

59%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

Desempenho na neve

64%

Nokian

WR Snowproof P

90%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

86%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Travagem de neve

Nokian WR Snowproof P

76%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

95%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

Tracção na neve

Nokian WR Snowproof P

73%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

91%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Manipulação da neve

Nokian WR Snowproof P

51%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

92%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

67%

Curvas em círculo na neve

Nokian WR Snowproof P

56%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

82%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Conforto e ruído

76%

Nokian

WR Snowproof P

80%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

85%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

67%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Ruído externo

Nokian WR Snowproof P

91%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

82%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

56%

Conforto ao rodar

Nokian WR Snowproof P

60%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

78%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Economia

77%

Nokian

WR Snowproof P

69%

Kleber

KRISALP HP3

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Resistência ao rolamento

Nokian WR Snowproof P

73%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

73%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

73%

Quilometragem

Nokian WR Snowproof P

81%

Kleber KRISALP HP3

65%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

57%

Testes usados na comparação

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Inverno	2022	215/55 R17	Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Comparação: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

WR Snowproof P

KRISALP HP3

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Blizzak LM-005

Test profile

Comparação de desempenho

Testes usados na comparação

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação