4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Nokian
WR Snowproof P
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Número de testes
7
23
14
23
Best position
#4
#1
#1
#1
Average position
9.7
6.7
3.6
3.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
55
107
188
176

Neve

Neve
Nokian WR Snowproof P
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Travagem de neve
Nokian WR Snowproof P
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Tracção na neve
Nokian WR Snowproof P
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Encanto da neve
Nokian WR Snowproof P
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Manipulação da neve
Nokian WR Snowproof P
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
Nokian WR Snowproof P
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%

Molhado

Molhado
Nokian WR Snowproof P
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian WR Snowproof P
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian WR Snowproof P
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian WR Snowproof P
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian WR Snowproof P
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian WR Snowproof P
35%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%

Seco

Seco
Nokian WR Snowproof P
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Travagem a seco
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian WR Snowproof P
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Mudança de faixa seca
Nokian WR Snowproof P
93%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%

Custos

Custos
Nokian WR Snowproof P
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Quilometragem
Nokian WR Snowproof P
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Preço/valor
Nokian WR Snowproof P
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%

Conforto

Conforto
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Ruído exterior
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Conforto
Nokian WR Snowproof P
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação