Comparação: Nokian WetProof vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Médio-alto

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

WetProof

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Número de testes

14

16

3

1

Best position

#1

#3

#2

#1

Average position

5.6

5.5

3.7

1.0

Teste mais recente

2023

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

47

153

34

64

Molhado

Nokian WetProof

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Nokian WetProof

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Nokian WetProof

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Nokian WetProof

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Frenagem úmida

Nokian WetProof

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Curva em círculo molhado

Nokian WetProof

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Guia lateral húmida

Nokian WetProof

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

67%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Seco

Nokian WetProof

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Travagem a seco

Nokian WetProof

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Manuseamento a seco

Nokian WetProof

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Mudança de faixa seca

Nokian WetProof

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comportamento em condução seca

Nokian WetProof

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Resposta da direcção seca

Nokian WetProof

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

67%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Conforto

Nokian WetProof

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Ruído exterior

Nokian WetProof

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Ruído interior

Nokian WetProof

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Conforto

Nokian WetProof

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Custos

Nokian WetProof

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Resistência ao rolamento

Nokian WetProof

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Quilometragem

Nokian WetProof

56%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Preço/valor

Nokian WetProof

46%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

23%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Nokian WetProof vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

WetProof

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação