4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Nokian WetProof vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Nokian
WetProof
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Número de testes
14
18
3
3
2
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
5.6
6.1
3.7
3.3
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2024
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
47
34
40
23

Molhado

Molhado
Nokian WetProof
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian WetProof
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian WetProof
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian WetProof
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian WetProof
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Guia lateral húmida
Nokian WetProof
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Seco

Seco
Nokian WetProof
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Travagem a seco
Nokian WetProof
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian WetProof
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Mudança de faixa seca
Nokian WetProof
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Resposta da direcção seca
Nokian WetProof
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Conforto

Conforto
Nokian WetProof
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Ruído exterior
Nokian WetProof
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Conforto
Nokian WetProof
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Custos

Custos
Nokian WetProof
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian WetProof
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Quilometragem
Nokian WetProof
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação