4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Nokian WetProofMédio-alto
NokianNokian

WetProof

5.9
R14 – R20
Firestone RoadhawkMédio-alto
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.7
R15 – R21
Kumho Ecsta HS52Médio-alto
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Nokian
WetProof
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
14
21
10
3
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
5.6
11.9
6.0
3.3
Teste mais recente
2023
2024
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
47
164
104
40

Molhado

Molhado
Nokian WetProof
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian WetProof
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian WetProof
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian WetProof
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian WetProof
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Guia lateral húmida
Nokian WetProof
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Desempenho em molhado
Nokian WetProof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Seco

Seco
Nokian WetProof
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian WetProof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Comportamento em condução seca
Nokian WetProof
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Desempenho em piso seco
Nokian WetProof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Conforto

Conforto
Nokian WetProof
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Conforto
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Ruído interior
Nokian WetProof
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Custos

Custos
Nokian WetProof
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian WetProof
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Quilometragem
Nokian WetProof
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preço/valor
Nokian WetProof
46%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Eficiência de combustível
Nokian WetProof
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação