Comparação: Nokian WetProof vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Médio-alto

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

WetProof

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Número de testes

14

3

1

3

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

5.6

3.7

1.0

3.3

Teste mais recente

2023

2025

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

47

34

64

40

Molhado

Nokian WetProof

84%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Nokian WetProof

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Nokian WetProof

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Frenagem úmida

Nokian WetProof

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Nokian WetProof

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Curva em círculo molhado

Nokian WetProof

91%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Guia lateral húmida

Nokian WetProof

89%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Seco

Nokian WetProof

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Travagem a seco

Nokian WetProof

87%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Manuseamento a seco

Nokian WetProof

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Mudança de faixa seca

Nokian WetProof

81%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Resposta da direcção seca

Nokian WetProof

63%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Conforto

Nokian WetProof

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Ruído exterior

Nokian WetProof

86%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Conforto

Nokian WetProof

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Custos

Nokian WetProof

60%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Resistência ao rolamento

Nokian WetProof

61%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Quilometragem

Nokian WetProof

56%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Nokian WetProof vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

WetProof

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação