Comparação: Nokian WetProof vs. Dunlop Sport BluResponse vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

Médio-alto

Nokian

WetProof

VS

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Ventus S1 evo3 K127

Ecsta HS52

Test profile

WetProof

Sport BluResponse

Roadhawk

Efficient Grip Performance 2

PremiumContact 6

Número de testes

14

18

21

18

36

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

5.6

8.3

11.9

6.1

3.1

Teste mais recente

2023

2024

2023

Tamanhos disponíveis

47

78

164

47

296

Comparação de desempenho

Desempenho em molhado

70%

Nokian

WetProof

67%

Dunlop

Sport BluResponse

79%

Firestone

Roadhawk

64%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

Frenagem úmida

Nokian WetProof

71%

Dunlop Sport BluResponse

63%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

96%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Nokian WetProof

75%

Dunlop Sport BluResponse

59%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

59%

Continental PremiumContact 6

75%

Aquaplanagem longitudinal

Nokian WetProof

66%

Dunlop Sport BluResponse

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

57%

Continental PremiumContact 6

57%

Aquaplanagem transversal

Nokian WetProof

69%

Dunlop Sport BluResponse

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Continental PremiumContact 6

51%

Desempenho em piso seco

76%

Nokian

WetProof

68%

Dunlop

Sport BluResponse

84%

Firestone

Roadhawk

67%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

Travagem a seco

Nokian WetProof

76%

Dunlop Sport BluResponse

76%

Firestone Roadhawk

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

66%

Continental PremiumContact 6

66%

Manuseamento a seco

Nokian WetProof

75%

Dunlop Sport BluResponse

59%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Continental PremiumContact 6

75%

Conforto e ruído

73%

Nokian

WetProof

81%

Dunlop

Sport BluResponse

63%

Firestone

Roadhawk

81%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

68%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

Ruído externo

Nokian WetProof

81%

Dunlop Sport BluResponse

71%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Continental PremiumContact 6

71%

Conforto ao rodar

Nokian WetProof

64%

Dunlop Sport BluResponse

91%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Continental PremiumContact 6

64%

Economia

55%

Nokian

WetProof

67%

Dunlop

Sport BluResponse

55%

Firestone

Roadhawk

94%

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Continental

PremiumContact 6

Resistência ao rolamento

Nokian WetProof

71%

Dunlop Sport BluResponse

88%

Firestone Roadhawk

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

88%

Continental PremiumContact 6

55%

Quilometragem

Nokian WetProof

38%

Dunlop Sport BluResponse

46%

Firestone Roadhawk

46%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Continental PremiumContact 6

84%

Testes usados na comparação

Organização	Temporada	Ano	Dimensão
Autobild	Verão	2021	205/55 R16	Ver

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

View general comparison

Comparação: Nokian WetProof vs. Dunlop Sport BluResponse vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

WetProof

Sport BluResponse

Roadhawk

Efficient Grip Performance 2

PremiumContact 6

Test profile

Comparação de desempenho

Testes usados na comparação

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação