4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Nokian Powerproof vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Nokian PowerproofMédio-alto
NokianNokian

Powerproof

R17 – R20
Bridgestone Potenza S001Prémio
BridgestoneBridgestone

Potenza S001

R15 – R20
Continental PremiumContact 6Prémio
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
Firestone Roadhawk 2Médio-alto
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 S Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

Nokian
Powerproof
Bridgestone
Potenza S001
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Número de testes
11
5
36
6
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#3
Average position
7.5
7.0
3.1
4.7
Teste mais recente
2022
2020
2023
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
53
185
296
146

Molhado

Molhado
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian Powerproof
81%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian Powerproof
86%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
68%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian Powerproof
82%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Guia lateral húmida
Nokian Powerproof
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Desempenho em molhado
Nokian Powerproof
77%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
63%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%

Seco

Seco
Nokian Powerproof
83%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Travagem a seco
Nokian Powerproof
88%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Mudança de faixa seca
Nokian Powerproof
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Resposta da direcção seca
Nokian Powerproof
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Desempenho em piso seco
Nokian Powerproof
72%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
58%
Comportamento em condução seca
Nokian Powerproof
66%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
Nokian Powerproof
90%
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%

Conforto

Conforto
Nokian Powerproof
76%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Ruído exterior
Nokian Powerproof
64%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
60%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Conforto
Nokian Powerproof
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Ruído interior
Nokian Powerproof
80%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
58%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Custos

Custos
Nokian Powerproof
65%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian Powerproof
70%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
57%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Quilometragem
Nokian Powerproof
54%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Preço/valor
Nokian Powerproof
50%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Eficiência de combustível
Nokian Powerproof
84%
Bridgestone Potenza S001
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação