4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Perfil do teste

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
2
16
1
3
Melhor posição
#6
#3
#1
#2
Posição média
8.0
5.5
1.0
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2023
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
91
153
64
34

Molhado

Molhado
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian Powerproof 2
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Seco

Seco
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Conforto

Conforto
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Nokian Powerproof 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Custos

Custos
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação