4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Nokian Line vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Nokian LineMédio-alto
NokianNokian

Line

R14 – R17
Michelin e.PrimacyPrémio
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPrémio
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Nokian
Line
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
6
4
3
3
1
Best position
#6
#3
#2
#2
#1
Average position
12.2
12.0
3.3
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2018
2025
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
53
111
40
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
Nokian Line
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian Line
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian Line
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian Line
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian Line
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian Line
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Seco

Seco
Nokian Line
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian Line
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Mudança de faixa seca
Nokian Line
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Travagem a seco
Nokian Line
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Resposta da direcção seca
Nokian Line
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Custos

Custos
Nokian Line
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Quilometragem
Nokian Line
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian Line
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Conforto

Conforto
Nokian Line
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Nokian Line
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação