4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Nokian Line vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test profile

Nokian
Line
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Número de testes
6
3
10
Best position
#6
#2
#2
Average position
12.2
3.3
6.0
Teste mais recente
2018
2026
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
53
40
104

Molhado

Molhado
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian Line
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Seco

Seco
Nokian Line
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian Line
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Travagem a seco
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Custos

Custos
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Quilometragem
Nokian Line
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian Line
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Conforto

Conforto
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Ruído exterior
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Ruído interior
Nokian Line
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação