4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Nokian Line vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Nokian
Line
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
6
3
1
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
12.2
3.3
1.0
Teste mais recente
2018
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
53
40
64

Molhado

Molhado
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian Line
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian Line
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Seco

Seco
Nokian Line
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian Line
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Nokian Line
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Custos

Custos
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Quilometragem
Nokian Line
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian Line
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Conforto

Conforto
Nokian Line
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Nokian Line
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação