4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Nokian Line vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Nokian
Line
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
6
18
1
Best position
#6
#1
#1
Average position
12.2
6.1
1.0
Teste mais recente
2018
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
53
47
64

Molhado

Molhado
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Nokian Line
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Nokian Line
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Frenagem úmida
Nokian Line
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Nokian Line
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Seco

Seco
Nokian Line
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Nokian Line
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Nokian Line
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Custos

Custos
Nokian Line
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Quilometragem
Nokian Line
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Resistência ao rolamento
Nokian Line
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Preço/valor
Nokian Line
30%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Conforto

Conforto
Nokian Line
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Nokian Line
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Nokian Line
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação